Recently, the US Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the power of the Presidency and the separation of powers (Trump v. Slaughter). What is the historical understanding of Trump v Slaughter (and by extension, Humphrey’s Executor decision in 1935 )? What were the themes of the discussion? Were there any suprising revolations during the arguments?

Supreme Court expert Michael J. O’Neill, Vice President of Legal Affairs at Landmark Legal Foundation, offers his insights on the importance of this case and his observations from the oral arguments.